Timeline for Closed vs Rational Points on Schemes
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2022 at 8:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://www.math.uga.edu/~pete with http://alpha.math.uga.edu/~pete
|
|
| Nov 30, 2010 at 4:17 | history | edited | Pete L. Clark | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 6 characters in body
|
| Feb 3, 2010 at 11:21 | comment | added | Pete L. Clark | Thanks, AS. It seems that the downvote was removed. Again, I had no problem with it per se, but I'm quoting a result from a course that I taught last year. If the result is not correct, please tell me why! | |
| Feb 3, 2010 at 11:16 | comment | added | Wanderer | Your answer really adds something to the discussion, so I am upvoting it :) | |
| Feb 3, 2010 at 11:13 | comment | added | Wanderer | It is true that Liu mentions quite some things about the action about the absolute Galois group of the base field. Some of these things are left as exercises (usually in a more general setting), so be prepared to look at these exercises as well. I also remember that Mumford adresses this in his second chapter of "The red book of varieties and schemes". I think the right paragraph is called "fields of definition" (not entirely sure though). | |
| Feb 3, 2010 at 11:12 | comment | added | Pete L. Clark | To the downvoter: if there is something wrong with my answer, I would appreciate learning what it is. | |
| Feb 3, 2010 at 2:48 | history | answered | Pete L. Clark | CC BY-SA 2.5 |