Timeline for How to prove that a binary relation is a strongly rigid relation? i.e. Polρ only contains projections
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2013 at 21:13 | history | edited | Qinghe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 26 characters in body
|
| Aug 10, 2013 at 21:25 | vote | accept | Qinghe | ||
| Aug 11, 2013 at 19:16 | |||||
| Aug 10, 2013 at 16:52 | answer | added | The Masked Avenger | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 10, 2013 at 4:25 | history | edited | Qinghe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 51 characters in body; edited title
|
| Aug 10, 2013 at 4:11 | comment | added | The Masked Avenger | I see I missed the title. However, it would be good to edit the question to include that trivial means the clone preserving $\rho$ has only projections. | |
| Aug 10, 2013 at 3:57 | comment | added | The Masked Avenger | It might help to clarify "trivial". The notion that makes the most sense to me is that the clone is trivial (only projection functions). It might also be that trivial means primal, but your examples don't suggest that. Can you relate primal to this notion of strongly rigid? | |
| Aug 10, 2013 at 3:46 | review | First posts | |||
| Aug 10, 2013 at 4:50 | |||||
| Aug 10, 2013 at 3:26 | history | asked | Qinghe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |