Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 9, 2013 at 5:57 answer added Gil Kalai timeline score: 5
Aug 9, 2013 at 16:47 vote accept user66733
Jul 31, 2013 at 20:16 answer added Darius Math timeline score: 4
Jul 31, 2013 at 4:04 answer added Karl Schwede timeline score: 33
Jul 31, 2013 at 1:40 answer added Vidit Nanda timeline score: 11
Jul 31, 2013 at 0:57 history migrated from math.stackexchange.com (revisions)
Jul 30, 2013 at 21:22 comment added Makoto Kato Wikipedia: They are named for Francis Sowerby Macaulay (1916), who proved the unmixedness theorem for polynomial rings, and for Cohen (1946), who proved the unmixedness theorem for formal power series rings. All Cohen–Macaulay rings have the unmixedness property.
Jul 30, 2013 at 18:32 comment added Makoto Kato Serre's FAC refers to theorem of Cohen-Macaulay in Samuel's Alegre Locale(1953). It states that a system of parameters of a regular local ring is a regular sequence. Zariski-Samuel's book(1958) defines Cohen-Macaulay local ring(they call it Macaulay ring).
Jul 30, 2013 at 17:04 comment added Sam Hopkins You said you're studying Stanley-Reisner rings, so I assume you've read this, but this seminal paper does immediately demonstrate the relevance of Cohen-Macaulay rings to combinatorial commutative algebra: dedekind.mit.edu/~rstan/pubs/pubfiles/27.pdf
Jul 30, 2013 at 14:01 comment added Matt I don't know about historically, but one major reason in modern days is geometry. It turns out that if you form a "good" moduli space (insert some stability notion) of smooth varieties of some type, then they degenerate at the boundary to some singular varieties. It turns out that these will have at worst Cohen-Macaulay singularities, so understanding Cohen-Macaulay rings is extremely important in the study of classifying smooth varieties.
Jul 30, 2013 at 9:27 history asked user66733 CC BY-SA 3.0