Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 1, 2010 at 5:04 answer added Dev Sinha timeline score: 12
Feb 3, 2010 at 7:39 comment added Aaron Mazel-Gee Relatedly, here is a well-answered question I asked a while ago in an attempt to better understand those still-fairly-mysterious Steenrod squares: mathoverflow.net/questions/461/understanding-steenrod-squares
Feb 2, 2010 at 22:52 answer added Charles Rezk timeline score: 20
Feb 2, 2010 at 19:57 answer added Ilya Grigoriev timeline score: 34
Feb 2, 2010 at 19:13 history edited solbap CC BY-SA 2.5
added 10 characters in body
Feb 2, 2010 at 18:55 comment added solbap @Orbicular thanks! Spelling has never been my strong suit.
Feb 2, 2010 at 18:54 history edited solbap CC BY-SA 2.5
edited body; edited title
Feb 2, 2010 at 16:08 comment added Tim Perutz You're not the first to be flummoxed by Milnor-Stasheff's def of SW classes. The thing to do is to learn the axioms uniquely characterizing SW classes, prove existence by another method, and then view the M-S def as a theorem about Steenrod squares. Now those squares are just a tiny bit less mysterious!
Feb 2, 2010 at 16:01 comment added Orbicular Be careful not to mess up the name - the guy is called Stiefel (German for a certain type of boots)!
Feb 2, 2010 at 10:47 answer added Thorny timeline score: 8
Feb 2, 2010 at 10:29 history edited solbap CC BY-SA 2.5
added 385 characters in body; added 2 characters in body; added 8 characters in body
Feb 2, 2010 at 9:49 history asked solbap CC BY-SA 2.5