Skip to main content
15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
Jul 31, 2014 at 21:18 vote accept Dima Pasechnik
Jul 31, 2014 at 21:18 answer added Dima Pasechnik timeline score: 0
Aug 26, 2013 at 17:32 history edited Dima Pasechnik CC BY-SA 3.0
corrected the explanation of the formula, added a link
Aug 26, 2013 at 17:29 comment added Dima Pasechnik oops, indeed, the formula I gave is for the quotient of the centralizer over $\mathbb{Z}/2^k\mathbb{Z}$. I'll update the body of the question.
Aug 26, 2013 at 16:09 comment added Frieder Ladisch There must be a misprint in your formula, since we get no factor $(\mathbb{Z}/2^k)$. The result in Bass yields the formula $\bigoplus_{i=1}^k (\mathbb{Z}/2^i)^{2^{k-i}}$.
Aug 24, 2013 at 7:59 comment added Dima Pasechnik here I asked a more general question: mathoverflow.net/questions/140280/…
Aug 19, 2013 at 8:32 comment added Dima Pasechnik Murray's paper doesn't really give you a closed form answer, as far as I can see, but Prop. XI(5.7) of Bass indeed does. I wonder if the more general case of $2^km$-cycle, for $m$ odd, has been done before (We also have a result for this case too).
Jul 31, 2013 at 8:21 comment added Tim Dokchitser There is a paper by S. H. Murray, Conjugacy classes in Maximal Parabolic Subgroups of General Linear Groups, J. Algebra 233, 135-155 (2000). In Section 4 (Centralizers in general linear groups) he works out the centralizers of arbitrary elements in $GL_n(k)$.
Jul 29, 2013 at 7:29 comment added Jeremy Rickard You're calculating the group of units of the group algebra ${\mathbb F}_2C$ of a cyclic group $C$ of order $2^k$ (your matrix describes how a generator of $C$ acts on the regular representation, and so the centralizer is the group of units in $\operatorname{End}_{{\mathbb F}_2C}({\mathbb F}_2C)\cong\mathbb{F}_2C$). In this guise, it's calculated in Prop. XI(5.7) of Bass's Algebraic K-Theory.
Jul 28, 2013 at 22:05 history edited Dima Pasechnik CC BY-SA 3.0
added 3 characters in body
Jul 28, 2013 at 20:36 comment added user6976 @Geoff: You are right.
Jul 28, 2013 at 20:31 comment added Geoff Robinson The matrix is similar to a matrix in Jordan normal form with a single Jordan block and eigenvalue 1,so its centralizer is conjugate to the centralizer of that matrix in Jordan form.
Jul 28, 2013 at 20:28 comment added Geoff Robinson @Mark: That argument works in characteristic zero, but not here. The only eigenvalue in this case is 1.
Jul 28, 2013 at 19:52 history asked Dima Pasechnik CC BY-SA 3.0