Timeline for What is the right definition of the Picard group of a commutative ring?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2010 at 13:03 | comment | added | Harry Gindi | I doubled my there there. Oops. | |
| Feb 2, 2010 at 12:08 | comment | added | Pete L. Clark | The Bourbaki books (some more than others; CA is still widely read nowadays) are certainly excellent references for basic material, the more so if you have internet access to a savant who can quote them chapter and verse. The problem (for me) comes when I try to read them in the usual linear manner: they cover the trivial and the important in equal detail, and the end product is about five times as long as it should be. | |
| Feb 2, 2010 at 11:54 | comment | added | Harry Gindi | Bourbaki (and Clark) to the rescue. What a surprise. An acquaintance of mine was visiting Paris, and apparently they cite Bourbaki there up to the theorem number in lectures there. And of course, "Soit C un corps commutatif." | |
| Feb 2, 2010 at 3:47 | vote | accept | Pete L. Clark | ||
| Feb 2, 2010 at 3:44 | history | answered | Clark Barwick | CC BY-SA 2.5 |