Timeline for Two equivalent definitions of weak solution to parabolic PDE; don't understand proof
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2013 at 0:06 | comment | added | Ricardo Andrade | Dear @TaQ: Good point. That has also happened to me a couple of times. On the other hand, I have found that waiting a couple of days before editing to incorporate any corrections and changes is usually sufficient. It gives me enough time to find most obvious problems and then one or two edits should suffice. Personally, I don't always abide by this principle, but it tends to work well when I do. Your mileage may vary... :) | |
| Aug 20, 2013 at 23:57 | comment | added | TaQ | @ Ricardo Andrade: I know that but I thought that if there were need for more edits, I would do them all at the same time so that it would count only one edit. Once I edited my answer so many times that it became CW unintentionally as the edits were ten or more in number. | |
| Aug 20, 2013 at 8:50 | history | edited | Ricardo Andrade | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
minor edit to impose consistency of notation
|
| Aug 20, 2013 at 8:45 | comment | added | Ricardo Andrade | Dear @TaQ: I incorporated the correction in your comment into your answer. Please remember that you can edit your own answers. | |
| Aug 20, 2013 at 8:44 | history | edited | Ricardo Andrade | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
incorporated TaQ's comment into the answer; corrected typos (question was bumped to the top by Community bot)
|
| Jul 21, 2013 at 8:44 | comment | added | TaQ | By "Thence $f$ being in ..." I meant "Thence $u$ being in ..." | |
| Jul 21, 2013 at 8:11 | history | answered | TaQ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |