Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 9, 2019 at 13:45 comment added user44143 "Who would have though in 19th century that Minkowski Geometry...?" No one, since it was invented in the 20th century.
Jul 19, 2013 at 20:47 comment added Matthias Ludewig Probably, but in "Measuring the world", Gauss thinks to himself that all parallels touch in the end; which would mean that the universe was positively curved, when actually it was negatively curved. But after all, that's fiction, I don't know any actual references.
Jul 19, 2013 at 19:25 comment added Marcus Johnson I'm under the impression that Gauss seriously considered the possibility of the universe 'being' a non-Euclidean geometry...
Jul 19, 2013 at 16:46 history made wiki Post Made Community Wiki by François G. Dorais
Jul 19, 2013 at 15:16 comment added Matthias Ludewig No, of course not, but it needed a lot of work on the side of pure mathematics to give the necessary foundations. I would say it was pure math until it happened to be relevant for Physics; this might be an example why you can say "who knows what this might be good for" when working on some seemingly abstract topic.
Jul 19, 2013 at 13:38 comment added mindplay.dk I'm not an expert, but isn't General Relativity an example of theoretical physics? It involved maths, but Einstein was not a "pure" mathematician - is the theory of General Relativity considered a work of "pure" math?
Jul 19, 2013 at 12:02 comment added Matthias Ludewig Well, he just constructed this as an example of a negatively curved space; but I would consider this as a pure academic interest in the first place.
Jul 19, 2013 at 11:43 comment added Marcus Johnson Well, Gauss seemed to think so, didn't he?
Jul 19, 2013 at 7:45 history answered Matthias Ludewig CC BY-SA 3.0