http://www.math.umn.edu/~garrett/m/buildings/book.pdf

was derived from seminar notes on structure of split classical p-adic groups, intending to circumvent the larger apparatus of algebraic groups and buildings. It became clear in the original project that it was necessary to develop some aspects of buildings, since they encapsulated and packaged-up some otherwise-clumsy (if not intractable) issues.

For split classical groups, it is possible to develop the building-theory "directly" (as J. Tits did, too, before the general development) in terms of flags of subspaces and flags of lattices (with additional structure...)

http://www.math.umn.edu/~garrett/m/buildings/book.pdf

was derived from seminar notes on structure of split classical p-adic groups, intending to circumvent the larger apparatus of algebraic groups and buildings. It became clear in the original project that it was necessary to develop some aspects of buildings, since they encapsulated and packaged-up some otherwise-clumsy (if not intractable) issues.

For split classical groups, it is possible to develop the building-theory "directly" (as J. Tits did, too, before the general development) in terms of flags of subspaces and flags of lattices (with additional structure...)

Edit: also, a smaller, newer treatment of buildings without Coxeter group stuff intervening is at http://www.math.umn.edu/~garrett/m/v/bldgs.pdf

http://www.math.umn.edu/~garrett/m/building/book.pdf

was derived from seminar notes on structure of split classical p-adic groups, intending to circumvent the larger apparatus of algebraic groups and buildings. It became clear in the original project that it was necessary to develop some aspects of buildings, since they encapsulated and packaged-up some otherwise-clumsy (if not intractable) issues.

For split classical groups, it is possible to develop the building-theory "directly" (as J. Tits did, too, before the general development) in terms of flags of subspaces and flags of lattices (with additional structure...)

http://www.math.umn.edu/~garrett/m/buildings/book.pdf

was derived from seminar notes on structure of split classical p-adic groups, intending to circumvent the larger apparatus of algebraic groups and buildings. It became clear in the original project that it was necessary to develop some aspects of buildings, since they encapsulated and packaged-up some otherwise-clumsy (if not intractable) issues.

For split classical groups, it is possible to develop the building-theory "directly" (as J. Tits did, too, before the general development) in terms of flags of subspaces and flags of lattices (with additional structure...)