Timeline for Can the Lawvere fixed point theorem be used to prove the Brouwer fixed point theorem?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S Jun 17, 2023 at 21:09 | history | suggested | Jason Gross | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Fix typo, add dumb comment so that the "at least 6 characters" requirement is met
|
Jun 17, 2023 at 18:32 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Jun 17, 2023 at 21:09 | |||||
Apr 22, 2017 at 7:35 | comment | added | Sam Eisenstat | You can't have $e$ continuous w.r.t. the sup metric and have dense image, because that would give you a continuous surjection $\beta A \to B^{\beta A}$, where $\beta A$ is the Stone-Čech compactification, since $(B^A, \sup) \cong (B^{\beta A})$. You might be able to get $e$ continuous w.r.t. the exponential topology but have dense image w.r.t. the sup metric. Also, even though @ToddTrimble retracted his answer, you can't have a continuous surjection $A \to D^A$ with $A$ compact Hausdorff and $D$ a disk because $D^A$ would have the topology of the unit ball of a Banach space. | |
Apr 19, 2017 at 21:36 | comment | added | Andrej Bauer | We now have a bunch of results showing that the direct Lawvere fixed-point theorem is unlikely to succeed (see @ToddTrimble's answer). Can someone show that we can have $X \to [0,1]^X$ with a dense image? Or can we? | |
Jul 13, 2013 at 12:35 | history | edited | Andrej Bauer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 220 characters in body
|
Jul 13, 2013 at 8:03 | history | answered | Andrej Bauer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |