Timeline for Quillen equivalence of diagram categories
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2013 at 7:01 | vote | accept | Rasmus | ||
| Jul 15, 2013 at 7:01 | vote | accept | Rasmus | ||
| Jul 15, 2013 at 7:01 | |||||
| Jul 14, 2013 at 12:02 | history | edited | Rasmus | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 101 characters in body
|
| Jul 14, 2013 at 12:01 | comment | added | Rasmus | Right, I missed that too. Sorry for being slow on the uptake. Anyway, now we have everything there... | |
| Jul 14, 2013 at 11:22 | comment | added | Fernando Muro | I give an explicit reference for the fact that cofibrant diagrams are pointwise cofibrant in a comment above. | |
| Jul 14, 2013 at 11:13 | history | edited | Rasmus | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 119 characters in body
|
| Jul 14, 2013 at 10:45 | history | edited | Rasmus | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 40 characters in body
|
| Jul 14, 2013 at 9:53 | history | edited | Rasmus | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 333 characters in body
|
| Jul 13, 2013 at 14:13 | comment | added | Fernando Muro | This is why it is relevant that cofibrant diagrams are pointwise cofibrant | |
| Jul 13, 2013 at 13:37 | comment | added | Rasmus | (I added it here and on wikipedia.) | |
| Jul 13, 2013 at 13:32 | history | edited | Rasmus | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 39 characters in body
|
| Jul 13, 2013 at 13:30 | comment | added | Rasmus | @FernandoMuro: Indeed. That's seems to be missing in the wikipedia article. | |
| Jul 13, 2013 at 11:53 | comment | added | Fernando Muro | $c^X$ must be cofibrant and $d^X$ fibrant. | |
| Jul 12, 2013 at 21:52 | comment | added | Rasmus | (If this is correct, then it is easier than I thought.) | |
| Jul 12, 2013 at 21:44 | history | answered | Rasmus | CC BY-SA 3.0 |