Timeline for Ring of Witt Vectors and Tensor product of Fields
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 5, 2016 at 3:06 | comment | added | LSpice | A family of special cases, including the ones of interest to you, of an earlier, more general question was addressed by @WilberdvanderKallen. | |
Jul 13, 2013 at 20:10 | review | First posts | |||
Jul 13, 2013 at 20:20 | |||||
Jul 12, 2013 at 20:42 | review | Close votes | |||
Jul 14, 2013 at 0:34 | |||||
Jul 12, 2013 at 20:32 | history | edited | david | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 210 characters in body
|
Jul 12, 2013 at 20:32 | comment | added | david | @KevinVentullo: Oops, sorry. I was being stupid. But the above result is still true in that case. I edited my question. Thanks anyway! | |
Jul 12, 2013 at 20:04 | comment | added | Kevin Ventullo | It is not true in general that when $k$ is finite you will always have $k\subset k_1$ or $k_1\subset k$. | |
Jul 12, 2013 at 19:33 | history | asked | david | CC BY-SA 3.0 |