Timeline for What if the Riemann Hypothesis were false?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11 at 5:30 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
http -> https (the question was bumped anyway)
|
| Aug 27, 2015 at 16:52 | vote | accept | Craig Feinstein | ||
| Jul 12, 2013 at 15:33 | comment | added | Stopple | @v08ltu:Yes, I have Stark's thesis in front of me. Chapter 2 is the contrapositive, for class number 1. A 10th such discriminant $-p$ would imply the Riemann Hypothesis up to height $\sqrt{p}/2$. My answer above does say 'and others.' | |
| Jul 12, 2013 at 1:28 | comment | added | v08ltu | Such results "for a range of $d$" already exist, in terms of zeros which are closer than average (see Stark's thesis, or Montgomery/Weinberger I think though they use low-zeros of Dirichlet $L$-functions, same principle). So does this really have anything to do with RH failing per se? eudml.org/doc/205246 mathoverflow.net/questions/55959/… | |
| Jul 11, 2013 at 18:17 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by François G. Dorais | ||
| Jul 11, 2013 at 15:20 | history | answered | Stopple | CC BY-SA 3.0 |