Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 5, 2010 at 6:07 comment added Anton Geraschenko X=50 (see mathoverflow.net/faq#reputation)
Feb 5, 2010 at 5:54 comment added Mariano Suárez-Álvarez Nicolás, you need X reputation points for some X > 1 to comment on other people's answers. There are two accounts (mathoverflow.net/users/3679/nicolas-schmidt and mathoverflow.net/users/3693/nicolas-schmidt) under your name. I'll ask on meta for them to be joined.
Feb 3, 2010 at 14:09 comment added Nicolas Schmidt For some reason I cannot comment on his answer, I can only add comments to my own (?).
Feb 3, 2010 at 12:05 comment added David Jordan By the way, Ben won't see your further questions unless you comment to his answer.
Feb 3, 2010 at 12:04 comment added David Jordan Nicolas, yes you are right. I misunderstood Ben's answer and the comment following it. I have deleted my incorrect "contribution" to the conversation. So the answer to your question, combining Ben's first sentence, with Mariano's answer is, in fact, yes?
Feb 3, 2010 at 11:45 comment added Nicolas Schmidt The example of Ben cannot be correct, if I understand him correctly: The category of finite groups is embedded as a full subcategory of the category of affine group schemes over k via the constant group functor. Any epimorphism in the surrounding category remains of course an epimorphism in the smaller one. If the inclusion of a transposition into $S_3$ were an epimorphism of algebraic groups, it be so as abstract groups. But as was already mentioned, every epimorphism of finite groups is surjective (in fact this statement remains true without 'finite' and is an exercise in Saunders MacLane).
Feb 1, 2010 at 9:44 history answered Nicolas Schmidt CC BY-SA 2.5