Timeline for Does Anyone Know Anything about the Determinant and/or Inverse of this Matrix?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2013 at 4:47 | answer | added | Bruno Le Floch | timeline score: 10 | |
| S Jul 11, 2013 at 5:40 | history | suggested | Amritanshu Prasad | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
displayed the matrices
|
| Jul 11, 2013 at 5:26 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 11, 2013 at 5:40 | |||||
| Jul 10, 2013 at 22:13 | answer | added | Dietrich Burde | timeline score: 13 | |
| Jul 10, 2013 at 19:16 | answer | added | Steve Huntsman | timeline score: 11 | |
| Jul 10, 2013 at 18:08 | answer | added | Igor Rivin | timeline score: 14 | |
| Jul 10, 2013 at 18:02 | comment | added | Neil Strickland | When $n=5$, the numerator of the determinant is divisible by the large prime $179357$. This implies that, unlike the Hilbert matrix, there is no simple formula for the determinant as a ratio of products of factorials. | |
| Jul 10, 2013 at 18:01 | comment | added | John Wiltshire-Gordon | You can give a formula for the determinant using the Jacobi-Trudi identities | |
| Jul 10, 2013 at 17:55 | review | First posts | |||
| Jul 10, 2013 at 18:01 | |||||
| Jul 10, 2013 at 17:46 | comment | added | Clément de Seguins Pazzis | It's the Hadamard product of the Hilbert matrix with itself, so it is positive definite and its determinant is positive. | |
| Jul 10, 2013 at 17:40 | comment | added | Todd Trimble | I think this could stand some motivation. | |
| Jul 10, 2013 at 17:38 | history | asked | user36887 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |