Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 15, 2013 at 18:48 vote accept Chris Gerig
Jul 12, 2013 at 22:13 comment added Al-Amrani There is an example of explicit computations for a particular orbifold. A "divisive" weighted projective space $P(q_0,...,q_n)$ is s.t. the weight $q_i$ divides $q_i+1$ for each i. Its equivariant K-theory and cobordism ring have been recently computed by Harada, Holm, Ray and Williams (arxiv.org/abs/1306.1641).
Jul 12, 2013 at 14:32 vote accept Chris Gerig
Jul 12, 2013 at 14:32
Jul 10, 2013 at 19:59 answer added André Henriques timeline score: 13
Jul 10, 2013 at 19:19 history edited Chris Gerig CC BY-SA 3.0
added 261 characters in body
Jul 10, 2013 at 18:47 answer added Johannes Ebert timeline score: 11
Jul 10, 2013 at 15:22 comment added Misha I am not sure if this qualifies as a "construction" but the cobordism theory for orbifolds is far less developed than the one for manifolds. I might be behind the events, but, I do not think orbifold cobordism rings were completely computed (Andres Angel did some calculations). Same for surgery theory, I think.
Jul 10, 2013 at 8:54 answer added Daniel Moskovich timeline score: 13
Jul 9, 2013 at 17:41 comment added Ian Agol One basic remark is that there are (non-manifold) orbifolds which have trivial fundamental group, so are not developable (called "bad orbifolds") (in 2 dimensions, these are the teardrop and football orbifolds with distinct orders of the 2 cone points; it is a deep theorem that a compact 3-orbifold is good if and only if there are no bad 2-suborbifolds). So although the fundamental group is defined, it is not quite as useful as for manifolds (although the theory of good orbifolds are a good analogue).
Jul 9, 2013 at 17:25 history asked Chris Gerig CC BY-SA 3.0