Timeline for When does the categorical definition of a module work?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2013 at 15:25 | vote | accept | Daniel Miller | ||
| Jul 9, 2013 at 22:07 | comment | added | Martin Brandenburg | Well, I've been working on that for quite some time (see also mathoverflow.net/questions/56887). | |
| Jul 8, 2013 at 21:54 | comment | added | Daniel Miller | Very nice! I had been hoping that $\mathsf{QCoh}(X)$ could be given an "intrinsic definition" purely in terms of the category of schemes, but it looks like it's not quite that simple. | |
| Jul 8, 2013 at 18:31 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | +1 for the last paragraph - I remember chatting to some category theorists about what this definition of "module" entails for, say, the semi-abelian category of Cstar algebras... (We seemed to arrive at the conclusion that the only modules in Beck's sense would be zero) | |
| Jul 8, 2013 at 13:41 | history | edited | Martin Brandenburg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 811 characters in body
|
| Jul 8, 2013 at 10:40 | history | edited | Martin Brandenburg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 5 characters in body
|
| Jul 8, 2013 at 10:34 | history | answered | Martin Brandenburg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |