Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 2, 2010 at 0:56 comment added VA. In the work of Candelas-de la Ossa-Green-Parkes, the mirror symmetry is between the complex deformations on one side and the deformations of the (complexified) Kahler parameter of its mirror. The first one you can replace by algebraic deformations; char-p is OK. But the second one is essentially non-algebraic and needs C. Here, I don't know what to do, sorry. Perhaps mine is not the best answer here (personally, I upvoted Ben-Zvi's answer).
Feb 1, 2010 at 22:09 vote accept Kevin H. Lin
Feb 1, 2010 at 22:09 history bounty ended Kevin H. Lin
Feb 1, 2010 at 22:08 comment added Kevin H. Lin Yeah, I'm aware of the different "mirror symmetries", but as I say in the original question, what I'm most interested in is whether the "mirror conjecture" of Candelas et. al. is at all characteristic $p$ friendly. Do you know anything about this?
Jan 31, 2010 at 23:11 comment added VA. Well, it says quite generally that the family of CY hypersurfaces (or c.i. as per Batyrev-Borisov) in the first toric variety is the mirror for that in the second one. Then you can apply this to all kinds of things. For example, degenerations of the CYs in the first family correspond to deformations of CYs in the second family. Etc. Yes, that includes the duality between the Hodge and Betti numbers. There are so many "mirror symmetries": combinatorial, homological... Some of them are more char-p friendly than others.
Jan 31, 2010 at 22:58 comment added Kevin H. Lin By "Batyrev's combinatorial mirror symmetry", do you mean the Hodge diamond mirror symmetry?
Jan 31, 2010 at 22:45 history edited VA. CC BY-SA 2.5
removed a typo: 'smooth' DM stack
Jan 31, 2010 at 22:35 history edited VA. CC BY-SA 2.5
couple of words
Jan 31, 2010 at 22:23 history answered VA. CC BY-SA 2.5