Timeline for Is there something wrong with Hörmander's theorem on stationary phase method
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2013 at 13:03 | vote | accept | Zhi Qi | ||
| Jul 1, 2013 at 12:50 | vote | accept | Zhi Qi | ||
| Jul 1, 2013 at 13:03 | |||||
| Jul 1, 2013 at 11:59 | answer | added | Willie Wong | timeline score: 9 | |
| Jul 1, 2013 at 11:17 | comment | added | Willie Wong | I haven't looked too carefully at your description above, but looking at your final paragraph makes me wonder: are you using the right $D$? Hormander always used $D = -i \partial$ so that $D^2 = -\triangle$. This would easily account for the missing factor of $(-1)^\nu$ that you are looking for. | |
| Jul 1, 2013 at 11:12 | history | edited | Willie Wong |
edited tags
|
|
| Jul 1, 2013 at 6:55 | history | edited | Harald Hanche-Olsen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Minor edit replacing \"o by ö
|
| Jul 1, 2013 at 6:26 | review | First posts | |||
| Jul 1, 2013 at 6:27 | |||||
| Jul 1, 2013 at 6:10 | history | asked | Zhi Qi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |