Timeline for Why isn't $BG$ a group, for $G$ not abelian?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:19 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Jul 2, 2013 at 23:37 | comment | added | ziggurism | Apologies to Chris. | |
Jul 2, 2013 at 7:41 | comment | added | Rasmus | @Tom: Perhaps the lower limit only applies to suggested edits (I don't have enough rep to edit)? | |
Jun 30, 2013 at 9:54 | answer | added | S. Carnahan♦ | timeline score: 2 | |
Jun 29, 2013 at 20:51 | comment | added | Tom Leinster | I just did the edit you suggest, Rasmus, and the software didn't object. | |
Jun 29, 2013 at 20:50 | history | edited | Tom Leinster | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
spelling of Schommer-Pries
|
Jun 29, 2013 at 19:17 | comment | added | Rasmus | The correct spelling is Chris Schommer-Pries. Sommer-Preis sounds very german. ;) I would have suggested an edit, but an edit must change at least six characters, I was told. | |
Jun 29, 2013 at 18:38 | vote | accept | ziggurism | ||
Jun 29, 2013 at 18:36 | answer | added | Qiaochu Yuan | timeline score: 23 | |
Jun 29, 2013 at 18:32 | answer | added | Ian Agol | timeline score: 22 | |
Jun 29, 2013 at 18:18 | comment | added | Qiaochu Yuan | In the discrete case, this is a corollary of the Eckmann-Hilton argument. | |
Jun 29, 2013 at 18:01 | history | edited | ziggurism | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
clarify
|
Jun 29, 2013 at 17:51 | history | asked | ziggurism | CC BY-SA 3.0 |