Timeline for monodromy of Gauss-Manin over a Shimura variety
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2013 at 18:08 | comment | added | shipel | Shimura experts, come to rescue!! | |
| Jun 29, 2013 at 6:29 | comment | added | shipel | Could somebody else, if not ACL, develop his comment? | |
| Jun 28, 2013 at 14:44 | comment | added | shipel | Thanks Antoine. Could you elaborate a bit more on your comment and give some references? I would really appreciate that! | |
| Jun 28, 2013 at 14:34 | comment | added | ACL | FWIU the description of the usual compactifications identifies cusps to some parabolic subgroups and these loops to some unipotent elements. | |
| Jun 28, 2013 at 12:54 | comment | added | Donu Arapura | Shipel, in order to compute the residues mod integers, or equivalently monodromy of loops around boundary divisiors, you have to know what these loops correspond to in $\Gamma$. This requires more information. | |
| Jun 28, 2013 at 12:47 | comment | added | shipel | Thanks Donu. So that it means that you can compute the residues of the Gauss-Manin connection (at least their classes mod $\mathbb{Z}$) on the compactification without knowning anything about the compactification? This seems a bit weird to me | |
| Jun 28, 2013 at 12:41 | history | answered | Donu Arapura | CC BY-SA 3.0 |