Skip to main content
added 156 characters in body
Source Link

Consider a Poisson process with arrival rate $\lambda$ arrivals per unit time. Given a window of time $W$ and a total of $k$ events, what is the upper bound of the probability that no three events happen in that window? Said another way, if events are numbered $1,2,\ldots,k$, what is the upper bound of $$P(\operatorname{gap}(j,j+2) \geq W \text{ for all } 1 \leq j \leq k-2)?$$

The problem in estimating this for me has been that while each successive gap is distributed exponentially, $\operatorname{gap}(1,3)$ and $\operatorname{gap}(2,4)$ are dependent. So, my best upper bound so far is obtained by just completely ignoring half the gaps: $$ P\bigl(\operatorname{gap}(j,j+2) \geq W\ \text{ for }\ 1 \leq j \leq k-2\bigr) < P\bigl(\operatorname{gap}(j,j+2) \geq W\ \text{ for }\ 1 \leq j \leq k-2,\ j \text{ odd}\bigr). $$ The right hand side is approximately $P(\operatorname{gap}(1,3) \geq W)^{(k-1)/2} = \exp(-\lambda W)^{(k-1)/2}$$P(\operatorname{gap}(1,3) \geq W)^{(k-1)/2} = (\exp(-\lambda W)(1+\lambda W))^{(k-1)/2}$

because $exp(-\lambda W)(1+\lambda W)$ is the probability that 0 or 1 arrivals happened in duration W, and there are $(k-1)/2$ such odd gaps.

Is there a better upper bound?

Consider a Poisson process with arrival rate $\lambda$ arrivals per unit time. Given a window of time $W$ and a total of $k$ events, what is the upper bound of the probability that no three events happen in that window? Said another way, if events are numbered $1,2,\ldots,k$, what is the upper bound of $$P(\operatorname{gap}(j,j+2) \geq W \text{ for all } 1 \leq j \leq k-2)?$$

The problem in estimating this for me has been that while each successive gap is distributed exponentially, $\operatorname{gap}(1,3)$ and $\operatorname{gap}(2,4)$ are dependent. So, my best upper bound so far is obtained by just completely ignoring half the gaps: $$ P\bigl(\operatorname{gap}(j,j+2) \geq W\ \text{ for }\ 1 \leq j \leq k-2\bigr) < P\bigl(\operatorname{gap}(j,j+2) \geq W\ \text{ for }\ 1 \leq j \leq k-2,\ j \text{ odd}\bigr). $$ The right hand side is approximately $P(\operatorname{gap}(1,3) \geq W)^{(k-1)/2} = \exp(-\lambda W)^{(k-1)/2}$

Is there a better upper bound?

Consider a Poisson process with arrival rate $\lambda$ arrivals per unit time. Given a window of time $W$ and a total of $k$ events, what is the upper bound of the probability that no three events happen in that window? Said another way, if events are numbered $1,2,\ldots,k$, what is the upper bound of $$P(\operatorname{gap}(j,j+2) \geq W \text{ for all } 1 \leq j \leq k-2)?$$

The problem in estimating this for me has been that while each successive gap is distributed exponentially, $\operatorname{gap}(1,3)$ and $\operatorname{gap}(2,4)$ are dependent. So, my best upper bound so far is obtained by just completely ignoring half the gaps: $$ P\bigl(\operatorname{gap}(j,j+2) \geq W\ \text{ for }\ 1 \leq j \leq k-2\bigr) < P\bigl(\operatorname{gap}(j,j+2) \geq W\ \text{ for }\ 1 \leq j \leq k-2,\ j \text{ odd}\bigr). $$ The right hand side is approximately $P(\operatorname{gap}(1,3) \geq W)^{(k-1)/2} = (\exp(-\lambda W)(1+\lambda W))^{(k-1)/2}$

because $exp(-\lambda W)(1+\lambda W)$ is the probability that 0 or 1 arrivals happened in duration W, and there are $(k-1)/2$ such odd gaps.

Is there a better upper bound?

improved formatting
Source Link
Ricardo Andrade
  • 6.2k
  • 5
  • 42
  • 69

Consider a Poisson process with arrival rate $\lambda$ arrivals per unit time. Given a window of time $W$ and a total of $k$ events, what is the upper bound of the probability that no three events happen in that window? Said another way, if events are numbered $1,2,\ldots,k$, what is the upper bound of $$P(\operatorname{gap}(j,j+2) \geq W \text{ for all } 1 \leq j \leq k-2)?$$

The problem in estimating this for me has been that while each successive gap is distributed exponentially, $\operatorname{gap}(1,3)$ and $\operatorname{gap}(2,4)$ are dependent. So, my best upper bound so far is obtained by just completely ignoring half the gaps: $$ P(\operatorname{gap}(j,j+2) \geq W \,\forall\, 1 \leq j \leq k-2) < P(\operatorname{gap}(j,j+2) \geq W \,\forall\, 1 \leq j \leq k-2, j \text{ odd}). $$$$ P\bigl(\operatorname{gap}(j,j+2) \geq W\ \text{ for }\ 1 \leq j \leq k-2\bigr) < P\bigl(\operatorname{gap}(j,j+2) \geq W\ \text{ for }\ 1 \leq j \leq k-2,\ j \text{ odd}\bigr). $$ The right hand side is approximately $P(\operatorname{gap}(1,3) \geq W)^{(k-1)/2} = \exp(-\lambda W)^{(k-1)/2}$

Is there a better upper bound?

Consider a Poisson process with arrival rate $\lambda$ arrivals per unit time. Given a window of time $W$ and a total of $k$ events, what is the upper bound of the probability that no three events happen in that window? Said another way, if events are numbered $1,2,\ldots,k$, what is the upper bound of $$P(\operatorname{gap}(j,j+2) \geq W \text{ for all } 1 \leq j \leq k-2)?$$

The problem in estimating this for me has been that while each successive gap is distributed exponentially, $\operatorname{gap}(1,3)$ and $\operatorname{gap}(2,4)$ are dependent. So, my best upper bound so far is obtained by just completely ignoring half the gaps: $$ P(\operatorname{gap}(j,j+2) \geq W \,\forall\, 1 \leq j \leq k-2) < P(\operatorname{gap}(j,j+2) \geq W \,\forall\, 1 \leq j \leq k-2, j \text{ odd}). $$ The right hand side is approximately $P(\operatorname{gap}(1,3) \geq W)^{(k-1)/2} = \exp(-\lambda W)^{(k-1)/2}$

Is there a better upper bound?

Consider a Poisson process with arrival rate $\lambda$ arrivals per unit time. Given a window of time $W$ and a total of $k$ events, what is the upper bound of the probability that no three events happen in that window? Said another way, if events are numbered $1,2,\ldots,k$, what is the upper bound of $$P(\operatorname{gap}(j,j+2) \geq W \text{ for all } 1 \leq j \leq k-2)?$$

The problem in estimating this for me has been that while each successive gap is distributed exponentially, $\operatorname{gap}(1,3)$ and $\operatorname{gap}(2,4)$ are dependent. So, my best upper bound so far is obtained by just completely ignoring half the gaps: $$ P\bigl(\operatorname{gap}(j,j+2) \geq W\ \text{ for }\ 1 \leq j \leq k-2\bigr) < P\bigl(\operatorname{gap}(j,j+2) \geq W\ \text{ for }\ 1 \leq j \leq k-2,\ j \text{ odd}\bigr). $$ The right hand side is approximately $P(\operatorname{gap}(1,3) \geq W)^{(k-1)/2} = \exp(-\lambda W)^{(k-1)/2}$

Is there a better upper bound?

Consider a Poisson process with arrival rate lambda$\lambda$ arrivals per unit time. Given a window of time W$W$ and a total of k$k$ events, Whatwhat is the upper bound of the probability that no three events happen in that window.? Said another way, if events are numbered 1,2,...$1,2,\ldots,k$,k; what is the upper bound of Prob(gap(1,3) >= W and gap(2,4) >= W and gap(3,5) >= W and ... gap(k-2,k) >= W).$$P(\operatorname{gap}(j,j+2) \geq W \text{ for all } 1 \leq j \leq k-2)?$$

The problem in estimating this for me has been that while each successive gap is distributed exponentially, gap(1,3)$\operatorname{gap}(1,3)$ and gap(2,4)$\operatorname{gap}(2,4)$ are dependent. So, my best upper bound so far is obtained by just completely ignoring half the gaps:

Prob(gap(1,3) > W and gap(2,4) > w and gap(3,5) > W and ... gap(k-2,k) > W) < Prob(gap(1,3) > W and gap(3,5) > W and ....)$$ P(\operatorname{gap}(j,j+2) \geq W \,\forall\, 1 \leq j \leq k-2) < P(\operatorname{gap}(j,j+2) \geq W \,\forall\, 1 \leq j \leq k-2, j \text{ odd}). $$ ~ (Prob(gap(1,3) > W) ^The right hand side is approximately (k-1)/2 = exp(-lambda*W)^(k-1)/2$P(\operatorname{gap}(1,3) \geq W)^{(k-1)/2} = \exp(-\lambda W)^{(k-1)/2}$

Is there a better upper bound?

Consider a Poisson process with arrival rate lambda arrivals per unit time. Given a window of time W and a total of k events, What is the upper bound of the probability that no three events happen in that window. Said another way, if events are numbered 1,2,...,k; what is the upper bound of Prob(gap(1,3) >= W and gap(2,4) >= W and gap(3,5) >= W and ... gap(k-2,k) >= W).

The problem in estimating this for me has been that while each successive gap is distributed exponentially, gap(1,3) and gap(2,4) are dependent. So, my best upper bound so far is obtained by just completely ignoring half the gaps:

Prob(gap(1,3) > W and gap(2,4) > w and gap(3,5) > W and ... gap(k-2,k) > W) < Prob(gap(1,3) > W and gap(3,5) > W and ....) ~ (Prob(gap(1,3) > W) ^ (k-1)/2 = exp(-lambda*W)^(k-1)/2

Is there a better upper bound?

Consider a Poisson process with arrival rate $\lambda$ arrivals per unit time. Given a window of time $W$ and a total of $k$ events, what is the upper bound of the probability that no three events happen in that window? Said another way, if events are numbered $1,2,\ldots,k$, what is the upper bound of $$P(\operatorname{gap}(j,j+2) \geq W \text{ for all } 1 \leq j \leq k-2)?$$

The problem in estimating this for me has been that while each successive gap is distributed exponentially, $\operatorname{gap}(1,3)$ and $\operatorname{gap}(2,4)$ are dependent. So, my best upper bound so far is obtained by just completely ignoring half the gaps: $$ P(\operatorname{gap}(j,j+2) \geq W \,\forall\, 1 \leq j \leq k-2) < P(\operatorname{gap}(j,j+2) \geq W \,\forall\, 1 \leq j \leq k-2, j \text{ odd}). $$ The right hand side is approximately $P(\operatorname{gap}(1,3) \geq W)^{(k-1)/2} = \exp(-\lambda W)^{(k-1)/2}$

Is there a better upper bound?

Source Link
Loading