Timeline for Local expression involved in the definition of positivity of vector bundles
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
Jul 6, 2013 at 6:58 | vote | accept | Michael Albanese | ||
Jul 5, 2013 at 15:22 | comment | added | diverietti | Exactly. Moreover, the coefficients $c_{jk\lambda\mu}$ come from $\Theta(E)$. I mean that $\Theta(E)=\sum c_{jk\lambda\mu}dz_j\wedge d\bar z_k\otimes e_\lambda^*\otimes e_\mu$, and these $c_{jk\lambda\mu}$ are the ones which satisfy the hermitian relations above. | |
Jul 4, 2013 at 4:22 | comment | added | Michael Albanese | So does that mean in your previous answer you want $\theta_E(v\otimes\sigma, v\otimes\sigma) = h(\Theta(E)(v, \bar{v})\cdot\sigma, \sigma)$? Furthermore, just to be clear, the coefficients $c_{jk\lambda\mu}$ come from $i\Theta(E)$ not $\Theta(E)$, correct? | |
S Jun 27, 2013 at 6:08 | history | suggested | Fred Daniel Kline | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed syntax of array
|
Jun 27, 2013 at 4:06 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Jun 27, 2013 at 6:08 | |||||
Jun 23, 2013 at 22:25 | history | edited | diverietti | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 475 characters in body
|
Jun 23, 2013 at 22:11 | history | edited | diverietti | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 127 characters in body; added 84 characters in body
|
Jun 23, 2013 at 22:00 | history | answered | diverietti | CC BY-SA 3.0 |