Skip to main content

Timeline for set theory forcing

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

20 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 25, 2013 at 12:16 review First posts
Jun 26, 2013 at 10:01
Jun 25, 2013 at 12:13 history reopened Joel David Hamkins
Timothy Chow
Asaf Karagila
Daniel Moskovich
François G. Dorais
Jun 25, 2013 at 3:02 review Reopen votes
Jun 25, 2013 at 12:13
Jun 24, 2013 at 7:03 comment added Asaf Karagila Miguel, I too feel that this sort of question is a good fit for MO. However as with all other exercises which appear on this site, the level of the question must be above average. It should reflect the fact that you put quite an effort into the question before coming here. In either case I have voted to reopen this question.
Jun 24, 2013 at 2:07 comment added Joel David Hamkins Well, Miguel, despite the closure of your question, I'd like to welcome you to MathOverflow. I'm truly very sorry to see a newcomer get such a rough reception. I know that this could be discouraging, but I'd like to encourage you not to become discouraged. Please try to look past it and simply try again with other questions! Indeed, you seem to be studying forcing, and I'd particularly encourage questions on forcing, which is definitely on-topic here at MO. You may find that you will get a more favorable reception with a more carefully worded question or fuller explanation.
Jun 24, 2013 at 1:26 history closed Andrés E. Caicedo
Steven Landsburg
Henry Cohn
Simon Thomas
Nik Weaver
too localized
Jun 23, 2013 at 23:32 comment added Andreas Blass Joel's editing has produced a reasonable question, which might or might not be what the OP intended.
Jun 23, 2013 at 22:47 comment added Andrés E. Caicedo I think part of the question was also whether the assumption on the size of I or CH were necessary.
Jun 23, 2013 at 21:28 comment added Mariano Suárez-Álvarez (Any further discussion should probably happen in a meta thread)
Jun 23, 2013 at 21:24 history edited Joel David Hamkins CC BY-SA 3.0
edited body
Jun 23, 2013 at 21:16 comment added Joel David Hamkins François, I have edited.
Jun 23, 2013 at 21:16 history edited Joel David Hamkins CC BY-SA 3.0
added 97 characters in body; edited tags; edited body
Jun 23, 2013 at 21:00 comment added François G. Dorais I tend to side with Joel. I think the appropriate reaction is to edit the question. (This is not done enough on MO!)
Jun 23, 2013 at 20:46 comment added Joel David Hamkins Andres, what isn't clear? He wants to know if every function $f:\omega\to\omega$ added by the forcing $Fn(I,2)$ when $\omega_2\leq|I|$ does not dominate some ground model $g:\omega\to\omega$. Clearly the English could be improved, but the mathematical question seems clear. In my opinion, the downvotes and votes to close are not appropriate.
Jun 23, 2013 at 20:39 answer added Stefan Geschke timeline score: 5
Jun 23, 2013 at 20:36 comment added Andrés E. Caicedo No Joel, the question is not clear. There is in fact no question, and the sentences are hard to parse. We can sort of see what a possible question could perhaps be, given what is written, but that is a different story.
Jun 23, 2013 at 20:32 comment added Stefan Geschke I believe you are asking why Cohen forcing doesn't add dominating reals. A proof of this fact can in the Bartoszynski-Judah book "Set theory of the real line".
Jun 23, 2013 at 20:28 comment added Joel David Hamkins The question is completely clear. This is a graduate-level question about forcing, using completely standard notation and terminology. It seems fine for MO.
Jun 23, 2013 at 20:23 comment added Mariano Suárez-Álvarez Your question uses unexplained notation, mentions an exercise in a book but does not tell us what excercise nor what book, and it is quite not clear what you are trying to ask.
Jun 23, 2013 at 20:11 history asked Miguel CC BY-SA 3.0