Skip to main content
17 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 25, 2013 at 16:06 history closed Andreas Blass
Andrés E. Caicedo
Andrej Bauer
user6976
Andy Putman
not a real question
Jun 25, 2013 at 3:02 review Close votes
Jun 25, 2013 at 16:06
Jun 23, 2013 at 11:54 history edited XL _At_Here_There CC BY-SA 3.0
corrected spelling
Jun 23, 2013 at 11:33 history edited user9072
edited tags
Jun 23, 2013 at 3:59 answer added none timeline score: 3
Jun 23, 2013 at 2:06 vote accept XL _At_Here_There
Jun 23, 2013 at 2:05 vote accept XL _At_Here_There
Jun 23, 2013 at 2:06
Jun 23, 2013 at 2:04 vote accept XL _At_Here_There
Jun 23, 2013 at 2:05
Jun 23, 2013 at 1:59 answer added Noah Schweber timeline score: 7
Jun 23, 2013 at 1:24 history edited XL _At_Here_There CC BY-SA 3.0
corrected spelling
Jun 23, 2013 at 1:18 comment added XL _At_Here_There Actually,I do not like the reduced proof being defined in such way,but it is very easy to define it in such a way
Jun 23, 2013 at 1:14 history edited XL _At_Here_There CC BY-SA 3.0
fixed grammar
Jun 23, 2013 at 1:00 comment added XL _At_Here_There @Qiaochu,Sorry,what I want to know is not such a trivial argument,please see the edited post and the following answer and comments.
Jun 23, 2013 at 0:55 history edited XL _At_Here_There CC BY-SA 3.0
improved formatting
Jun 23, 2013 at 0:33 comment added Qiaochu Yuan Yes, but for trivial reasons. At any point in a proof you can insert, say, $p \to p \text{ and } q$ and then insert $p \text{ and} q \to p$.
Jun 23, 2013 at 0:33 answer added Andreas Blass timeline score: 6
Jun 23, 2013 at 0:25 history asked XL _At_Here_There CC BY-SA 3.0