Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
S May 5, 2020 at 15:28 history suggested Harry Richman CC BY-SA 4.0
added link to A'Campo paper
May 5, 2020 at 14:39 review Suggested edits
S May 5, 2020 at 15:28
Jun 22, 2013 at 0:42 comment added David E Speyer Another good link on the Coxeter element subject is Howlett, "Coxeter groups and M-matrices", ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=647197 . I am also unaware of any good references for elements of the group other than Coxeter elements.
Jun 21, 2013 at 21:40 comment added Hao Chen @Humphreys: This happens to be one of the papers that leads us to our current focus. Thanks.
Jun 21, 2013 at 21:13 comment added Jim Humphreys @Hao: A word of caution. In a "hyperbolic" situation, the standard geometric realization of the Coxeter group might not be the best representation to use. This kind of issue comes up, for instance, in a recent arXiv preprint: front.math.ucdavis.edu/1305.0052 (and it's always a concern when discussing infinite Coxeter groups that come up in geometry).
Jun 21, 2013 at 20:08 vote accept Hao Chen
Jun 21, 2013 at 20:07 comment added Hao Chen Thank you very much for your answer (and also for your book of course :P). A'Campo's note is among the documents on my desk. Seems that I didn't miss anything. Then I think I'll start to look into it. For your information, the Coxeter groups that I'm particularly interested in are those of type (n-1,1) ("lorentzian" or "hyperbolic" in literature). We may have observed something interesting about their eigenvectors, but nothing is clear yet.
Jun 21, 2013 at 18:55 history answered Jim Humphreys CC BY-SA 3.0