Skip to main content

Timeline for CAT(K) and Busemann [closed]

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 27, 2013 at 17:57 history closed Benoît Kloeckner
Misha
user6976
Willie Wong
Neil Strickland
Needs details or clarity
S Jun 25, 2013 at 3:02 review First posts
Jun 25, 2013 at 13:59
S Jun 25, 2013 at 3:02 review Close votes
Jun 27, 2013 at 17:57
Jun 21, 2013 at 2:42 vote accept Chris
Jun 20, 2013 at 23:25 answer added Sergei Ivanov timeline score: 9
Jun 20, 2013 at 22:11 comment added Lee Mosher @Chris: So there is a reasonable question here: Is it known whether a CAT(1) Busemann space must also be CAT(0)? But it sounds also as if you have extra information about this question in the form of a potential counterexample, in which case I suggest you take a look at the link "how to ask" up above, particularly under the heading "Provide background and motivation".
Jun 20, 2013 at 20:19 comment added Chris Yes, I know, hence my question. A space which is not cat(0) but it's Busemann convex cat be cat(1)?
Jun 20, 2013 at 20:11 comment added Misha Chris: Nobody says that CAT(1) implies CAT(0), this direction is completely false.
Jun 20, 2013 at 18:57 comment added Chris Misha: if X is cat(k) it is also cat(k') if k'>k. cat(0) implies cat(1) but the other implication does not seem obvious, does it?
Jun 20, 2013 at 18:50 comment added Misha Chris: If $x\le 0$ then $x\le 1$ as well. Why do you find it weird?
Jun 20, 2013 at 18:32 comment added Chris Thank you, yes, maybe, I have this space which is for sure Busemann and NOT CAT(0) but it seems to be CAT(1) which feels a bit weird to me.
Jun 20, 2013 at 18:30 comment added Lee Mosher Did you mean to ask a different question, then?
Jun 20, 2013 at 18:27 comment added Chris My space is not CAT(0).
Jun 20, 2013 at 18:18 comment added Lee Mosher Yes, every CAT(0) space is Busemann and CAT(1), so the Euclidean plane for example.
Jun 20, 2013 at 17:23 history asked Chris CC BY-SA 3.0