Timeline for The state space of the stabilization of a C*-algebra
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2010 at 5:28 | comment | added | Harry Gindi | I fixed a typo and removed some pointless LaTeX in the title. | |
| Mar 5, 2010 at 5:27 | history | edited | Harry Gindi | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
edited title
|
| Feb 3, 2010 at 5:25 | answer | added | Kamran Reihani | timeline score: 4 | |
| Feb 3, 2010 at 1:42 | answer | added | Kamran Reihani | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 30, 2010 at 5:19 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | @Martin: yes, I think that's fairly standard. It's certainly the usual definition of the stabilization of a $C^*$-algebra. | |
| Jan 30, 2010 at 1:52 | comment | added | Martin Brandenburg | K are the compact operators? | |
| Jan 29, 2010 at 21:31 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | I haven't got a reference to hand, but I think some of E.C. Lance's early papers on nuclear $C^*$-algebras have some discussion of this, because a key tool used in his proofs is a careful analysis of states on tensor products | |
| Jan 29, 2010 at 21:09 | history | asked | Kamran Reihani | CC BY-SA 2.5 |