Timeline for Why does the generalised Galvin-Prikry Theorem only hold at Ramsey cardinals?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
2 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2013 at 12:35 | comment | added | user33625 | Yes I suppose this may well be the case. Indeed, it seems that to carry over the proof you need $\kappa$ to be Ramsey. I guess the problem is less trivial than I imagined. (Since Shelah used barely a sentence, I thought it may be an easy proof for someone who knows more about Ramsey cardinals than me!) | |
| Jun 19, 2013 at 5:04 | history | answered | Péter Komjáth | CC BY-SA 3.0 |