Skip to main content
15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 26, 2022 at 18:42 comment added Graviton I accidentally wandered here from MathSE. Man, is this ever some abstract thinking. I'll stick with single variable calculus for now and come back in a decade when I understand this.
Nov 17, 2021 at 0:11 history edited David White
edited tags
S Dec 15, 2017 at 2:28 history suggested jeq CC BY-SA 3.0
Fixed broken link (in an already-bumped question).
Dec 15, 2017 at 0:44 review Suggested edits
S Dec 15, 2017 at 2:28
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
Jun 22, 2013 at 21:57 vote accept Theo Johnson-Freyd
Jun 20, 2013 at 10:20 answer added Ronnie Brown timeline score: 9
Jun 18, 2013 at 23:42 answer added Chris Schommer-Pries timeline score: 68
Jun 18, 2013 at 19:03 answer added David White timeline score: 11
Jun 18, 2013 at 17:47 comment added Theo Johnson-Freyd @Andrew: Thank you for fixing the stupid typos.
Jun 18, 2013 at 16:54 comment added Omar Antolín-Camarena Probably weak complicial sets are (among) the most developed option(s) for (∞,∞)-categories.
Jun 18, 2013 at 16:01 answer added Charles Rezk timeline score: 37
Jun 18, 2013 at 15:36 comment added Fernando Muro No. If there were such a consensus, you would have already got some answers. Probably, if you get concrete answers, you will be offered proposals, but no general consensus.
Jun 18, 2013 at 15:08 history edited Andrew Stacey CC BY-SA 3.0
excepted -> accepted
Jun 18, 2013 at 13:59 history asked Theo Johnson-Freyd CC BY-SA 3.0