Timeline for Is there an accepted definition of $(\infty,\infty)$ category?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 26, 2022 at 18:42 | comment | added | Graviton | I accidentally wandered here from MathSE. Man, is this ever some abstract thinking. I'll stick with single variable calculus for now and come back in a decade when I understand this. | |
Nov 17, 2021 at 0:11 | history | edited | David White |
edited tags
|
|
S Dec 15, 2017 at 2:28 | history | suggested | jeq | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed broken link (in an already-bumped question).
|
Dec 15, 2017 at 0:44 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Dec 15, 2017 at 2:28 | |||||
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
Jun 22, 2013 at 21:57 | vote | accept | Theo Johnson-Freyd | ||
Jun 20, 2013 at 10:20 | answer | added | Ronnie Brown | timeline score: 9 | |
Jun 18, 2013 at 23:42 | answer | added | Chris Schommer-Pries | timeline score: 68 | |
Jun 18, 2013 at 19:03 | answer | added | David White | timeline score: 11 | |
Jun 18, 2013 at 17:47 | comment | added | Theo Johnson-Freyd | @Andrew: Thank you for fixing the stupid typos. | |
Jun 18, 2013 at 16:54 | comment | added | Omar Antolín-Camarena | Probably weak complicial sets are (among) the most developed option(s) for (∞,∞)-categories. | |
Jun 18, 2013 at 16:01 | answer | added | Charles Rezk | timeline score: 37 | |
Jun 18, 2013 at 15:36 | comment | added | Fernando Muro | No. If there were such a consensus, you would have already got some answers. Probably, if you get concrete answers, you will be offered proposals, but no general consensus. | |
Jun 18, 2013 at 15:08 | history | edited | Andrew Stacey | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
excepted -> accepted
|
Jun 18, 2013 at 13:59 | history | asked | Theo Johnson-Freyd | CC BY-SA 3.0 |