Timeline for Vanishing cohomology of de-Rham Witt complex
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2013 at 12:20 | vote | accept | Jana | ||
| S Jun 26, 2013 at 10:10 | history | suggested | Fred Daniel Kline | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
removed backticks and put braces around the subscripts
|
| Jun 26, 2013 at 10:05 | comment | added | Fred Daniel Kline | @NeilStrickland, any _x needs to be _{x}. | |
| Jun 26, 2013 at 9:59 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jun 26, 2013 at 10:10 | |||||
| Jun 26, 2013 at 9:46 | answer | added | JBorger | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jun 18, 2013 at 11:23 | history | edited | Neil Strickland | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed LaTeX
|
| Jun 18, 2013 at 11:21 | comment | added | Neil Strickland | @Jana: Some kinds of LaTeX need to be enclosed in backwards quote marks. I am not sure of the exact rules but H^* and H^. usually cause problems. I changed H^. to H^\bullet for readability as well. | |
| Jun 18, 2013 at 11:19 | history | edited | Angelo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 14 characters in body
|
| Jun 18, 2013 at 11:18 | history | edited | Neil Strickland | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed LaTeX
|
| Jun 18, 2013 at 11:07 | comment | added | Jana | There is problem with the display | |
| Jun 18, 2013 at 11:06 | history | asked | Jana | CC BY-SA 3.0 |