Timeline for embeddings of graphs into surfaces
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 18, 2013 at 18:45 | vote | accept | Misha | ||
Jun 18, 2013 at 18:45 | vote | accept | Misha | ||
Jun 18, 2013 at 18:45 | |||||
Jun 18, 2013 at 16:46 | comment | added | Misha | Lee: Yes, this was the motivation. | |
Jun 18, 2013 at 16:15 | comment | added | Lee Mosher | Regarding question 1, your two assumptions together imply that $rank(\Gamma)=2genus(S)$, because the first says $1−r \ge 1−2g$ and surjectivity of $i_∗$ implies $r \ge 2g$. Is that the intent? | |
Jun 18, 2013 at 16:07 | answer | added | Bruno Martelli | timeline score: 9 | |
Jun 18, 2013 at 12:11 | history | edited | Misha | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added surjectivity assumption
|
Jun 18, 2013 at 12:06 | comment | added | Misha | @Bruno: You are absolutely right, this is impossible (one sees this by lifting maps to the universal cover). I am interested in maps which induce epimorphisms of fundamental groups, so I will add this to the question. | |
Jun 18, 2013 at 10:51 | comment | added | Bruno Martelli | I make a simple modification of your example, just to understand the problem. Take $\Gamma = K_5$ and $\Gamma'$ the rose with 6 petals. Embed $\Gamma'$ in a disc contained in a surface $S$ with large genus. To answer your question positively you need to embed $K_5$ in $S$ with a map which is homotopic to a costant map. But that sounds impossible to me. | |
Jun 18, 2013 at 3:32 | history | edited | Misha | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
Jun 18, 2013 at 3:10 | history | asked | Misha | CC BY-SA 3.0 |