Timeline for Semi-Standard Young Tableaux: Do Diagrams for $O(2m)$ combine to Diagrams from $O(2m+1)$?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2013 at 13:02 | comment | added | Carlo Beenakker | fixed the LaTeX | |
| Jun 12, 2013 at 13:02 | history | edited | Carlo Beenakker | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed latex
|
| Jun 12, 2013 at 9:58 | history | edited | Norbert Dragon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Correct statement of the problem
|
| Jun 11, 2013 at 18:08 | comment | added | darij grinberg | I think it's the indentation. | |
| Jun 11, 2013 at 18:08 | history | edited | darij grinberg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 9 characters in body
|
| Jun 11, 2013 at 18:01 | comment | added | Norbert Dragon | The preview displayed my LaTeX correctly. Unluckily, in the post the conjecture displays only it's LaTeX source. It would be fine, if someone could correct this. | |
| Jun 11, 2013 at 17:50 | history | edited | Norbert Dragon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Repairing LaTeX
|
| Jun 11, 2013 at 17:40 | history | asked | Norbert Dragon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |