Timeline for All AI-algebras are AT-algebras
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2015 at 9:22 | answer | added | Hannes Thiel | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 4, 2013 at 21:31 | comment | added | Gabor Szabo | The way you phrase it is wrong. When you assume that the C*-algebras in question are unital and simple, then I guess that it is true. | |
| Jun 7, 2013 at 0:28 | history | edited | David | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 35 characters in body
|
| Jun 7, 2013 at 0:23 | comment | added | David | It is a well-known result. Its proof is on page 57 of "Classification of Nuclear $C^{\ast}$-Algebras, Entropy in Operator Algebras, M. Rordam, E. Stormer". I am looking for an intuitive description or possibly an example. As I mentioned before, its converse makes more sense to me. | |
| Jun 6, 2013 at 23:01 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | The way you phrase this question makes it seem like a (non-trivial!) exercise. If this is a known result then presumably you are able to look up the papers in which this is proved. On the other hand, if this is an open question then I think you should give more details about which cases you already know how to do, where you have tried looking, and so on. | |
| Jun 6, 2013 at 19:07 | history | asked | David | CC BY-SA 3.0 |