Timeline for Recommended books/lecture notes for vector bundle on algebraic curve
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22 at 14:59 | comment | added | trequartista | Dear @GeorgesElencwajg, most of the survey links are dead. Could you please share the surveys again, may be by email? | |
| Nov 7, 2018 at 19:14 | comment | added | Georges Elencwajg | Dear @Deane: yes I had also heard about Kronecker's result. Scharlau attributes to Dedekind-Weber the algebraic result underlying Grothendieck's result. And Birkhoff is also supposed to be another predecessor of the splitting theorem ... | |
| Nov 7, 2018 at 18:41 | history | edited | j.c. | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
direct link to Newstead's survey
|
| Nov 7, 2018 at 18:35 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
mino typo
|
| Nov 7, 2018 at 18:32 | history | edited | Georges Elencwajg | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Replaced dead links by live ones
|
| Nov 7, 2018 at 17:46 | comment | added | Deane Yang | In my thesis I needed a normal form for a pair of matrices, and my adviser told me to look in Gantmacher’s book for the Kronecker pencil lemma. He also said in passing that it was equivalent to the Grothendieck splitting theorem. I recall verifying this and in fact discussing it in my thesis. Kronecker’s paper is in 1890. | |
| Nov 7, 2018 at 17:21 | history | edited | j.c. | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
add some links, cleanup google links, mark dead links
|
| Jun 11, 2013 at 3:38 | vote | accept | trequartista | ||
| Jun 6, 2013 at 9:41 | history | edited | Georges Elencwajg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 27 characters in body
|
| Jun 6, 2013 at 9:28 | history | answered | Georges Elencwajg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |