Timeline for $(1+\epsilon)$-injective Banach spaces, complex scalars
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
24 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S Jul 19, 2021 at 12:00 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
S Jul 19, 2021 at 12:00 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
S Jul 11, 2021 at 10:54 | history | bounty started | Fred Dashiell | ||
S Jul 11, 2021 at 10:54 | history | notice added | Fred Dashiell | Draw attention | |
Sep 13, 2013 at 18:42 | comment | added | Bill Johnson | I have not had time to think about it, Norbert. Fred is an expert on this topic, so I don't expect it to be easy. | |
S Sep 8, 2013 at 16:59 | history | suggested | Norbert | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
explicit empahazis on incorrectness of answer below
|
Sep 8, 2013 at 16:50 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Sep 8, 2013 at 16:59 | |||||
S Sep 8, 2013 at 16:47 | history | bounty ended | Norbert | ||
S Sep 8, 2013 at 16:47 | history | notice removed | Norbert | ||
Sep 6, 2013 at 17:49 | history | edited | Fred Dashiell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fix link to Lindenstrauss' paper
|
Sep 6, 2013 at 12:37 | comment | added | Norbert | @BillJohnson it is sad to waste this bounty in vain. May be you have any ideas how to prove this theorem for complex case? | |
Sep 5, 2013 at 2:16 | history | edited | Fred Dashiell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
add link to Lindenstrauss 1964 AMS Memoir
|
Sep 1, 2013 at 17:04 | review | Suggested edits | |||
Sep 1, 2013 at 17:25 | |||||
S Sep 1, 2013 at 17:03 | history | bounty started | Norbert | ||
S Sep 1, 2013 at 17:03 | history | notice added | Norbert | Authoritative reference needed | |
Aug 21, 2013 at 0:12 | history | edited | Fred Dashiell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
warn reader about incorrect proof
|
Jul 5, 2013 at 9:11 | history | edited | Fred Dashiell |
add tag hahn-banach-theorem
|
|
Jul 1, 2013 at 19:55 | vote | accept | Fred Dashiell | ||
Jul 6, 2013 at 23:38 | |||||
Jul 1, 2013 at 18:59 | answer | added | Fred Dashiell | timeline score: 9 | |
Jul 1, 2013 at 18:46 | history | edited | Fred Dashiell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 322 characters in body
|
Jun 4, 2013 at 18:17 | comment | added | Bill Johnson | Why a down vote for this good question? | |
Jun 4, 2013 at 15:29 | comment | added | Bill Johnson | Sure, because for dual spaces you can use weak$^*$ compactness. A similar proof shows that a dual space that is $\pi_{\lambda}^\infty$ for every $\lambda > 1 $ is $1$-injective. | |
Jun 4, 2013 at 13:52 | history | edited | Fred Dashiell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
add remark about dual space
|
Jun 2, 2013 at 23:32 | history | asked | Fred Dashiell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |