Timeline for Regarding a Paper by Paul.A Clement on Tridiagonal Matrices
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:19 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| May 30, 2013 at 19:03 | comment | added | J. M. isn't a mathematician | As you have linked to the paper by Taussky and Todd, you might want to mention www-math.mit.edu/~edelman/homepage/papers/kac.pdf as well... | |
| May 30, 2013 at 18:33 | history | edited | Dietrich Burde | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| May 30, 2013 at 11:58 | comment | added | Dietrich Burde | @Darij: you are right, the proof is not evident. My answer was (is) a comment about the mistake of the matrix, not more. @Gerry: I have found your link and the answers, thank you. The correction to the problem got lost, as we see. | |
| May 30, 2013 at 11:46 | history | edited | Dietrich Burde | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 390 characters in body; added 12 characters in body
|
| May 29, 2013 at 23:47 | comment | added | Gerry Myerson | Yes, OP posted to m.se, I posted a $3\times3$ counterexample, then the correction to the problem was noted, and a link was given to a previous m.se question about the same matrix. | |
| May 29, 2013 at 20:46 | comment | added | darij grinberg | Why easily? Where is the symmetry? | |
| May 29, 2013 at 19:58 | history | edited | Dietrich Burde | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 53 characters in body
|
| May 29, 2013 at 19:34 | history | edited | Dietrich Burde | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 91 characters in body
|
| May 29, 2013 at 19:19 | history | edited | Dietrich Burde | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 237 characters in body
|
| May 29, 2013 at 19:05 | history | answered | Dietrich Burde | CC BY-SA 3.0 |