Timeline for An "inchworm-like" random walk on an integer interval
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2013 at 17:29 | comment | added | fedja | Nope. The stationary measure us trivial: the uniform distribution on all configurations. What I mean is that I have no idea how to find what they call $\sigma^2$ with any decent precision for this huge chain in terms of $k$ and $d$. | |
| May 30, 2013 at 11:15 | comment | added | R W | Don't see any problem here. Look at Pre-theorem 2.1 from the paper I quote, condition (iii). The only difficulty might be in finding the stationary measure - is this what you mean? | |
| May 30, 2013 at 2:35 | comment | added | fedja | Yes, of course. However, the devil here is in the computation of correlations between steps. Even the asymptotic regime doesn't look trivial to me :(. | |
| May 29, 2013 at 13:10 | history | answered | R W | CC BY-SA 3.0 |