Timeline for Mathematical explanation of the failure to quantize gravity naively
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
14 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 1 at 16:19 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
http -> https (the question was bumped anyway)
|
Jan 28, 2010 at 1:54 | comment | added | Harry Gindi | That's like saying "The bullet-stopping power of a cardboard box!" I'm only teasing, of course. ;) | |
Jan 28, 2010 at 1:42 | comment | added | Steve Huntsman | @Mariano: It beats "the level of rigor of physics"! | |
Jan 28, 2010 at 1:40 | comment | added | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | «the level of rigor of mathematical physics» always makes me smile uncomfortably :) | |
Jan 28, 2010 at 1:37 | comment | added | Steve Huntsman | Glad to help. See also the more physicsish phy.olemiss.edu/~luca/Topics/qg/renorm.html | |
Jan 28, 2010 at 1:27 | history | edited | Steve Huntsman | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
removed spurious "quantum"
|
Jan 28, 2010 at 1:24 | comment | added | Harry Gindi | This is a comment I'm willing to upvote and accept. Thank you, Steve. | |
Jan 28, 2010 at 1:23 | comment | added | Steve Huntsman | Done. Deleting other comments. | |
Jan 28, 2010 at 1:22 | history | edited | Steve Huntsman | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
incorporated comments into answer
|
Jan 28, 2010 at 0:43 | comment | added | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | @Steve: you should edit the answer to include your comments. It makes for much more linear reading! :) | |
Jan 28, 2010 at 0:06 | comment | added | Tom LaGatta | @Steve, that's a great answer. Thanks for giving a succinct explanation. | |
Jan 27, 2010 at 23:54 | comment | added | Urs Schreiber | renormalization itself can be made pretty much mathematically precise, see ncatlab.org/nlab/show/renormalization | |
Jan 27, 2010 at 23:48 | comment | added | Harry Gindi | That's not really a mathematical explanation. I'm looking for something more sophisticated. | |
Jan 27, 2010 at 23:43 | history | answered | Steve Huntsman | CC BY-SA 2.5 |