Timeline for Any closed form for series like $F(x)=\sum\limits_{p=2}^{\infty}x^p,$ where $p$ is prime?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
22 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2023 at 6:15 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Mar 20, 2023 at 5:47 | history | edited | Daniele Tampieri | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Minor Math Jaxing
|
| Mar 20, 2023 at 3:39 | history | edited | XL _At_Here_There | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Aug 27, 2022 at 14:06 | comment | added | XL _At_Here_There | @JosephVanName， excellent | |
| Aug 27, 2022 at 14:02 | comment | added | Joseph Van Name | Here is an answered related question mathoverflow.net/q/80572/22277. Here we find out F. Carlson has shown in 1921 that power series with integer coefficients and radius of convergence 1 are either rational or have the unit disk as a natural boundary. | |
| Aug 26, 2022 at 20:16 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
`\Sigma` -> `\sum`, while this is on the front page (other stylistic issues left mostly untouched)
|
| Aug 26, 2022 at 20:05 | answer | added | Joseph Van Name | timeline score: 3 | |
| Aug 26, 2022 at 14:05 | history | edited | Denis Serre | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 28 characters in body; edited title
|
| Aug 26, 2022 at 8:52 | history | edited | XL _At_Here_There | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
| May 25, 2013 at 3:34 | vote | accept | XL _At_Here_There | ||
| May 25, 2013 at 3:34 | vote | accept | XL _At_Here_There | ||
| May 25, 2013 at 3:34 | |||||
| May 24, 2013 at 23:34 | answer | added | fedja | timeline score: 11 | |
| May 24, 2013 at 6:04 | history | edited | XL _At_Here_There | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed grammar
|
| May 24, 2013 at 5:48 | comment | added | XL _At_Here_There | @Gerry,@i707i707,thank both of you very much,your expressions are right,they are what I intend to express | |
| May 24, 2013 at 5:34 | comment | added | Gerry Myerson | XL, you came back here to edit your question, but did nothing to engage with the comments. Why? | |
| May 24, 2013 at 5:00 | history | edited | XL _At_Here_There | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
corrected spelling
|
| May 24, 2013 at 2:13 | history | edited | user9072 |
edited tags; edited tags
|
|
| May 24, 2013 at 2:02 | comment | added | Sungjin Kim | This might be better expression: $$\sum_{p\textrm{ prime}} x^p$$ | |
| May 24, 2013 at 1:51 | comment | added | Gerry Myerson | Your first display makes no sense. Maybe you meant $$\sum_{p=2}^{\infty}x^p,p{\rm\ is\ prime}$$ | |
| May 24, 2013 at 1:44 | answer | added | Sungjin Kim | timeline score: 9 | |
| May 24, 2013 at 1:05 | history | edited | XL _At_Here_There | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
corrected spelling
|
| May 24, 2013 at 0:59 | history | asked | XL _At_Here_There | CC BY-SA 3.0 |