Timeline for Why don't more mathematicians improve Wikipedia articles?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2013 at 1:50 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by S. Carnahan♦ | ||
| May 22, 2013 at 12:58 | comment | added | aslan | @Dustin G. Mixon: Fair enough, but there might be instances where no references are given (especially when only MathWorld has a page on a topic). You are then left with using either the webpage or Weisstein's book as reference (or finding another source). | |
| May 22, 2013 at 12:34 | comment | added | Dustin G. Mixon | @JD Vlok: I'm much more comfortable citing the references in Wikipedia or MathWorld. | |
| May 22, 2013 at 12:10 | comment | added | aslan | There are also other resources such as Wolfram (mathworld.wolfram.com) with its content published in Eric Weisstein's Concise Encyclopedia of Mathematics which is probably better to use as reference in an academic article than Wikipedia. | |
| May 22, 2013 at 11:51 | history | answered | Federico Poloni | CC BY-SA 3.0 |