Timeline for Vector field pull back from embedding
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2013 at 12:44 | comment | added | Nevermind | So what you say is,that different choices of $r$ gives different vector fields on $M$? Hmm... Can you explain why? | |
| May 19, 2013 at 12:32 | comment | added | Nevermind | Ok it requires both the data of $f$ and $r$ and $r$ is not uniquely defined by $f$. But it is a well defined vector field on $M$ at least. Right? | |
| May 19, 2013 at 11:51 | history | edited | Lev Soukhanov | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 12 characters in body
|
| May 19, 2013 at 11:46 | comment | added | Benoît Kloeckner | In other word, your "pull-back" vector field depends on both $f$ and $r$, while to properly define a $f^*X$ you would like it to depend only on $f$. | |
| May 19, 2013 at 11:39 | history | answered | Lev Soukhanov | CC BY-SA 3.0 |