Timeline for Questions about the proof of Stickelberger's theorem on discriminants
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2021 at 19:33 | comment | added | Alphonse | Just a note for myself: given any $\tau \in Gal(L / \Bbb Q)$, the set $\{\tau \circ \sigma_i\}_i$ is a permutation of the $\{\sigma_i\}$, so that we have the dichotomy in (2). | |
| May 18, 2013 at 22:55 | comment | added | Dietrich Burde | @darij: sorry, you are right. | |
| May 18, 2013 at 22:54 | history | edited | Dietrich Burde | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 93 characters in body
|
| May 18, 2013 at 22:04 | comment | added | darij grinberg | I am not convinced of (1). (The Holden proof sidesteps this completely by only using that $P$ and $N$ lie in $K^{\mathrm{gal}}$. | |
| May 18, 2013 at 18:44 | history | edited | Dietrich Burde | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 85 characters in body
|
| May 18, 2013 at 18:11 | comment | added | Pritam Majumder | Can you please tell how do you prove your first and second claim ? | |
| May 18, 2013 at 17:58 | history | edited | Dietrich Burde | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 58 characters in body; added 37 characters in body; deleted 1 characters in body
|
| May 18, 2013 at 17:52 | history | answered | Dietrich Burde | CC BY-SA 3.0 |