Timeline for New differintegral formula: how is it related to other differintegral formulas?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2014 at 6:39 | history | edited | Andrés E. Caicedo |
edited tags
|
|
| May 31, 2013 at 23:22 | history | bounty ended | Anixx | ||
| May 31, 2013 at 13:28 | comment | added | Gerald Edgar | One of the ways to do fractional derivatives and integrals is to do them as multiplications in Laplace transform space. A drawback might be the difficulty of computing the inverse Laplace transform to get back. If you are using all the derivatives of the function, as here, then maybe you can do the inverse Laplace transform using Post's inversion formula en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post%27s_inversion_formula | |
| May 31, 2013 at 9:19 | answer | added | Bazin | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 25, 2013 at 16:18 | history | edited | Anixx | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 14 characters in body; edited body
|
| May 25, 2013 at 16:05 | comment | added | Anixx | @Andrew indeed it is typo. I have corrected. | |
| May 25, 2013 at 16:05 | history | edited | Anixx | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| May 25, 2013 at 6:56 | comment | added | Andrew | Why in the second formula there is the limit $t\to x$? What will change if to take in the rhs $f^{(k)}(x)$ instead of $f^{(k)}(t)$? | |
| May 24, 2013 at 23:00 | history | edited | Anixx | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 42 characters in body
|
| May 24, 2013 at 23:00 | history | bounty started | Anixx | ||
| May 17, 2013 at 11:24 | comment | added | Anixx | @Gerald Edgar do you have something to say here? | |
| May 17, 2013 at 0:47 | history | edited | Anixx |
edited tags; edited tags; edited tags; edited tags
|
|
| May 17, 2013 at 0:39 | history | edited | Anixx | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 174 characters in body; added 14 characters in body
|
| May 17, 2013 at 0:33 | history | asked | Anixx | CC BY-SA 3.0 |