Skip to main content
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
Source Link

This question reminds me of Peter Freyd's work on fixed points. I forget the reference for that but Google will show you some of the follow-up work that other people have done since.

Fixed points of this nature live in domains, which live in categories that do not have pullbacks and equalisers, so the notion of kernel is not going to help you.

Be warned, however: there are results in this area that are extremely clever tricks, but such tricks are possibly only discovered once per decade. In the meantime, you will cover thousands of pages with calculations that lead to absolutely nothing.

The two examples I had in mind were Pataraia's and Bekić'sBekić's fixed point theorems. (The late Georgian Dito) Pataraia's theorem is that in a DCPO $P$ with $\bot$, every monotone $f:P\to P$ has a least fixed point. As the comments indicate, the proof is very clever, very short and available in various places on the Web, though Pataraia never published it in a journal.

This question reminds me of Peter Freyd's work on fixed points. I forget the reference for that but Google will show you some of the follow-up work that other people have done since.

Fixed points of this nature live in domains, which live in categories that do not have pullbacks and equalisers, so the notion of kernel is not going to help you.

Be warned, however: there are results in this area that are extremely clever tricks, but such tricks are possibly only discovered once per decade. In the meantime, you will cover thousands of pages with calculations that lead to absolutely nothing.

The two examples I had in mind were Pataraia's and Bekić's fixed point theorems. (The late Georgian Dito) Pataraia's theorem is that in a DCPO $P$ with $\bot$, every monotone $f:P\to P$ has a least fixed point. As the comments indicate, the proof is very clever, very short and available in various places on the Web, though Pataraia never published it in a journal.

This question reminds me of Peter Freyd's work on fixed points. I forget the reference for that but Google will show you some of the follow-up work that other people have done since.

Fixed points of this nature live in domains, which live in categories that do not have pullbacks and equalisers, so the notion of kernel is not going to help you.

Be warned, however: there are results in this area that are extremely clever tricks, but such tricks are possibly only discovered once per decade. In the meantime, you will cover thousands of pages with calculations that lead to absolutely nothing.

The two examples I had in mind were Pataraia's and Bekić's fixed point theorems. (The late Georgian Dito) Pataraia's theorem is that in a DCPO $P$ with $\bot$, every monotone $f:P\to P$ has a least fixed point. As the comments indicate, the proof is very clever, very short and available in various places on the Web, though Pataraia never published it in a journal.

added 262 characters in body
Source Link
Paul Taylor
  • 8.5k
  • 1
  • 29
  • 58

This question reminds me of Peter Freyd's work on fixed points. I forget the reference for that but Google will show you some of the follow-up work that other people have done since.

Fixed points of this nature live in domains, which live in categories that do not have pullbacks and equalisers, so the notion of kernel is not going to help you.

Be warned, however: there are results in this area that are extremely clever tricks, but such tricks are possibly only discovered once per decade. In the meantime, you will cover thousands of pages with calculations that lead to absolutely nothing.

The two examples I had in mind were Pataraia's and Bekić's fixed point theorems. For(The late Georgian Dito) Pataraia's theorem is that in a DCPO $P$ with $\bot$, every monotone $f:P\to P$ has a least fixed point. As the first see belowcomments indicate, the proof is very clever, very short and available in various places on the Web, though Pataraia never published it in a journal.

This question reminds me of Peter Freyd's work on fixed points. I forget the reference for that but Google will show you some of the follow-up work that other people have done since.

Fixed points of this nature live in domains, which live in categories that do not have pullbacks and equalisers, so the notion of kernel is not going to help you.

Be warned, however: there are results in this area that are extremely clever tricks, but such tricks are possibly only discovered once per decade. In the meantime, you will cover thousands of pages with calculations that lead to absolutely nothing.

The two examples I had in mind were Pataraia's and Bekić's fixed point theorems. For the first see below.

This question reminds me of Peter Freyd's work on fixed points. I forget the reference for that but Google will show you some of the follow-up work that other people have done since.

Fixed points of this nature live in domains, which live in categories that do not have pullbacks and equalisers, so the notion of kernel is not going to help you.

Be warned, however: there are results in this area that are extremely clever tricks, but such tricks are possibly only discovered once per decade. In the meantime, you will cover thousands of pages with calculations that lead to absolutely nothing.

The two examples I had in mind were Pataraia's and Bekić's fixed point theorems. (The late Georgian Dito) Pataraia's theorem is that in a DCPO $P$ with $\bot$, every monotone $f:P\to P$ has a least fixed point. As the comments indicate, the proof is very clever, very short and available in various places on the Web, though Pataraia never published it in a journal.

added Pataraia and Bekic
Source Link
Paul Taylor
  • 8.5k
  • 1
  • 29
  • 58

This question reminds me of Peter Freyd's work on fixed points. I forget the reference for that but Google will show you some of the follow-up work that other people have done since.

Fixed points of this nature live in domains, which live in categories that do not have pullbacks and equalisers, so the notion of kernel is not going to help you.

Be warned, however: there are results in this area that are extremely clever tricks, but such tricks are possibly only discovered once per decade. In the meantime, you will cover thousands of pages with calculations that lead to absolutely nothing.

The two examples I had in mind were Pataraia's and Bekić's fixed point theorems. For the first see below.

This question reminds me of Peter Freyd's work on fixed points. I forget the reference for that but Google will show you some of the follow-up work that other people have done since.

Fixed points of this nature live in domains, which live in categories that do not have pullbacks and equalisers, so the notion of kernel is not going to help you.

Be warned, however: there are results in this area that are extremely clever tricks, but such tricks are possibly only discovered once per decade. In the meantime, you will cover thousands of pages with calculations that lead to absolutely nothing.

This question reminds me of Peter Freyd's work on fixed points. I forget the reference for that but Google will show you some of the follow-up work that other people have done since.

Fixed points of this nature live in domains, which live in categories that do not have pullbacks and equalisers, so the notion of kernel is not going to help you.

Be warned, however: there are results in this area that are extremely clever tricks, but such tricks are possibly only discovered once per decade. In the meantime, you will cover thousands of pages with calculations that lead to absolutely nothing.

The two examples I had in mind were Pataraia's and Bekić's fixed point theorems. For the first see below.

Source Link
Paul Taylor
  • 8.5k
  • 1
  • 29
  • 58
Loading