Skip to main content
Question Protected by CommunityBot
deleted 595 characters in body
Source Link
Rodrigo A. Pérez
  • 3.1k
  • 2
  • 41
  • 47

What are the main ideas of Harald Helfgott's proof that all odd $n \geq 5$ is the sum of 3 primes?

This is breaking news, but is there a general feeling that the proof is correct?

Edit: As Greg Martin points out, the proof is expected to be right, so the second question is not necessary.

However, I still think that the first question is valid. This is a major development in Number Theory and it would be nice to see the MO community discussing the details. Judging by the number of views in 4 days and the votes to reopen, people seem interested, so please consider reopening.

If and when it reopens, I will edit this comment away to keep only the actual question.

What are the main ideas of Harald Helfgott's proof that all odd $n \geq 5$ is the sum of 3 primes?

This is breaking news, but is there a general feeling that the proof is correct?

Edit: As Greg Martin points out, the proof is expected to be right, so the second question is not necessary.

However, I still think that the first question is valid. This is a major development in Number Theory and it would be nice to see the MO community discussing the details. Judging by the number of views in 4 days and the votes to reopen, people seem interested, so please consider reopening.

If and when it reopens, I will edit this comment away to keep only the actual question.

What are the main ideas of Harald Helfgott's proof that all odd $n \geq 5$ is the sum of 3 primes?

Post Reopened by Rodrigo A. Pérez, Kevin Ventullo, Frank Thorne, Andrés E. Caicedo, Vivek Shende
added 148 characters in body
Source Link
Rodrigo A. Pérez
  • 3.1k
  • 2
  • 41
  • 47

What are the main ideas of Harald Helfgott's proof that all odd $n \geq 5$ is the sum of 3 primes?

This is breaking news, but is there a general feeling that the proof is correct?

UpdateEdit: TheAs Greg Martin points out, the proof is expected to be right, so the second question is not even necessary as it seems that there is agreement already. 

However, I still think that the first question is valid. Even though it has been answered,This is a major development in Number Theory and it canwould be reopenednice to allow further discussion ofsee the proofMO community discussing the details. Judging by the number of views in 4 days and the votes to reopen, people seem interested, so please consider reopening.

If and when it reopens, I will edit this comment away to keep only the actual question.

What are the main ideas of Harald Helfgott's proof that all odd $n \geq 5$ is the sum of 3 primes?

This is breaking news, but is there a general feeling that the proof is correct?

Update: The second question is not even necessary as it seems that there is agreement already. However, I still think that the first question is valid. Even though it has been answered, it can be reopened to allow further discussion of the proof details.

If and when it reopens, I will edit this comment away to keep only the actual question.

What are the main ideas of Harald Helfgott's proof that all odd $n \geq 5$ is the sum of 3 primes?

This is breaking news, but is there a general feeling that the proof is correct?

Edit: As Greg Martin points out, the proof is expected to be right, so the second question is not necessary. 

However, I still think that the first question is valid. This is a major development in Number Theory and it would be nice to see the MO community discussing the details. Judging by the number of views in 4 days and the votes to reopen, people seem interested, so please consider reopening.

If and when it reopens, I will edit this comment away to keep only the actual question.

deleted 15 characters in body
Source Link
Rodrigo A. Pérez
  • 3.1k
  • 2
  • 41
  • 47

What are the main ideas of Harald Helfgott's proof that all odd $n \geq 5$ is the sum of 3 primes?

This is breaking news, but is there a general feeling that the proof is correct?

Update: It seems that theThe second question is not even necessary;necessary as it seems that there is agreement already. However, I still think that the first question is valid. Even though it has been answered, I think it can be reopened to allow further discussion of the proof details.

If and when it reopens, I will edit this comment away to keep only the actual question.

What are the main ideas of Harald Helfgott's proof that all odd $n \geq 5$ is the sum of 3 primes?

This is breaking news, but is there a general feeling that the proof is correct?

Update: It seems that the second question is not even necessary; it seems there is agreement already. However, I still think that the first question is valid. Even though it has been answered, I think it can be reopened to allow further discussion of the proof details.

If and when it reopens, I will edit this comment away to keep only the actual question.

What are the main ideas of Harald Helfgott's proof that all odd $n \geq 5$ is the sum of 3 primes?

This is breaking news, but is there a general feeling that the proof is correct?

Update: The second question is not even necessary as it seems that there is agreement already. However, I still think that the first question is valid. Even though it has been answered, it can be reopened to allow further discussion of the proof details.

If and when it reopens, I will edit this comment away to keep only the actual question.

added 378 characters in body
Source Link
Rodrigo A. Pérez
  • 3.1k
  • 2
  • 41
  • 47
Loading
Post Closed as "off topic" by Anthony Quas, Felipe Voloch, Oscar Randal-Williams, Ryan Budney, HJRW
Source Link
Rodrigo A. Pérez
  • 3.1k
  • 2
  • 41
  • 47
Loading