Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 16, 2014 at 23:29 history edited Ricardo Andrade CC BY-SA 3.0
edited tags
Aug 31, 2013 at 23:25 comment added SashaKolpakov There are some proofs by considering bigons (for spherical geometry) and subdivisions of an ideal triangle (in hyperbolic geometry). You may also consult J. Ratcliffe's book "Foundations of hyperbolic manifolds", some of the first chapters. However, the area of a bigon or ideal triangle is computed by "not very elementary" means there. I agree with Anton, all "elementary proofs" are cheating up to a certain extent.
Aug 31, 2013 at 23:13 history edited user9072
edited tags
May 13, 2013 at 18:20 vote accept Matthias Ludewig
May 13, 2013 at 18:20 vote accept Matthias Ludewig
May 13, 2013 at 18:20
May 13, 2013 at 0:30 comment added Igor Khavkine For both cases, there are visual proofs, which can be considered elementary: mathoverflow.net/questions/8846/proofs-without-words/… and mathoverflow.net/questions/8846/proofs-without-words/…
May 12, 2013 at 21:31 comment added Misha For $\kappa<0$ Gauss had a similar inclusion-exclusion proof: It is in his collected works (letter to Wolfgang/Farkas Bolyai).
May 12, 2013 at 18:16 answer added Anton Petrunin timeline score: 7
May 12, 2013 at 12:39 comment added S. Carnahan For $\kappa > 0$, I believe you can use inclusion-exclusion with 3 geodesics on a sphere.
May 12, 2013 at 12:29 answer added Alexandre Eremenko timeline score: 11
May 12, 2013 at 10:44 history asked Matthias Ludewig CC BY-SA 3.0