Skip to main content
MathOverflow

Return to Answer

replaced http://front.math.ucdavis.edu/ with https://arxiv.org/abs/
Source Link
Community Bot
Community Bot
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

(sorry I have troubles with comments, I post here even if it is not an answer) I have a new information. In On a fat small object argumentOn a fat small object argument, it is proved that in a λ-combinatorial model category, every cofibrant object is a λ-filtered colimit of λ-presentable cofibrant objects, which is close to what I wanted.

(sorry I have troubles with comments, I post here even if it is not an answer) I have a new information. In On a fat small object argument, it is proved that in a λ-combinatorial model category, every cofibrant object is a λ-filtered colimit of λ-presentable cofibrant objects, which is close to what I wanted.

(sorry I have troubles with comments, I post here even if it is not an answer) I have a new information. In On a fat small object argument, it is proved that in a λ-combinatorial model category, every cofibrant object is a λ-filtered colimit of λ-presentable cofibrant objects, which is close to what I wanted.

Source Link
Philippe Gaucher
Philippe Gaucher
  • 3.9k
  • 20
  • 30

(sorry I have troubles with comments, I post here even if it is not an answer) I have a new information. In On a fat small object argument, it is proved that in a λ-combinatorial model category, every cofibrant object is a λ-filtered colimit of λ-presentable cofibrant objects, which is close to what I wanted.