Timeline for If a $d \log$ form is exact, is it zero?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2013 at 17:34 | answer | added | David E Speyer | timeline score: 4 | |
| May 9, 2013 at 16:11 | vote | accept | David E Speyer | ||
| May 9, 2013 at 17:01 | |||||
| May 9, 2013 at 15:52 | answer | added | Will Sawin | timeline score: 4 | |
| May 9, 2013 at 4:53 | comment | added | Will Sawin | If we add extra variables, $X$ can always be seen as the intersection of a subtorus and a subvariety cut out by linear equations. If it is a complete intersection when so described, I think we can wedge with a form that is perpendicular to the subtorus to reduce to the linear equations case, but that might be nonsense. | |
| May 9, 2013 at 1:42 | comment | added | Allen Knutson | This is a sort of Hodge theorem for subvarieties of tori, I guess? That each cohomology class should have but one representative of this form? | |
| May 9, 2013 at 1:34 | history | edited | Allen Knutson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 characters in body
|
| May 9, 2013 at 0:05 | history | edited | David E Speyer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| May 8, 2013 at 23:37 | history | asked | David E Speyer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |