Timeline for examples of "exotic" moduli problems for elliptic curves?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 27, 2013 at 10:00 | vote | accept | Will Chen | ||
May 9, 2013 at 1:55 | comment | added | JSE | Yes, in some sense it explains them all! This is a result of myself and McReynolds arxiv.org/abs/0909.1851 very much inspired by the old paper of Diaz, Donagi, and Harbater, "Every curve is a Hurwitz curve." | |
May 8, 2013 at 19:35 | comment | added | Will Chen | I was hoping it might, but I don't know yet. I'm looking into it. | |
May 8, 2013 at 5:47 | comment | added | Will Sawin | Does this explain some non-congruence modular curves? | |
May 8, 2013 at 3:25 | comment | added | Will Chen | ahh thanks. Didn't think to do that. | |
May 8, 2013 at 1:27 | comment | added | S. Carnahan♦ | If you look at the source, you'll see that these are $(\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z})^{2g}$, Spec $\mathbb{Z}[1/\# G]$, and Spec $\mathbb{Z}[1/n]$, respectively. | |
May 8, 2013 at 0:51 | comment | added | Marty | But such a cool-looking paper! | |
May 8, 2013 at 0:50 | comment | added | Marty | Either that's a bizarre TeX error, or else I have a new entry for the question mathoverflow.net/questions/18593/… | |
May 8, 2013 at 0:27 | comment | added | Will Chen | Also $\text{Spec}(\mathbb{Z}[\nVdash/\ltimes])$ in the statement of theorem 3.1.1 on the first page. | |
May 8, 2013 at 0:25 | comment | added | Will Chen | Hmm, so in that arxiv paper, they're using some symbols I'm not familiar with. In particular, in the first paragraph, what does $(\mathbb{Z}/\ltimes\mathbb{Z})^{\nvDash\partial}$, and $\text{Spec}(\mathbb{Z}[\nVdash/\#\mathbb{G}])$ mean? | |
May 7, 2013 at 23:59 | history | edited | Jonathan Wise | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 12 characters in body
|
May 7, 2013 at 20:23 | history | answered | JSE | CC BY-SA 3.0 |