Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 27, 2013 at 10:00 vote accept Will Chen
May 9, 2013 at 1:55 comment added JSE Yes, in some sense it explains them all! This is a result of myself and McReynolds arxiv.org/abs/0909.1851 very much inspired by the old paper of Diaz, Donagi, and Harbater, "Every curve is a Hurwitz curve."
May 8, 2013 at 19:35 comment added Will Chen I was hoping it might, but I don't know yet. I'm looking into it.
May 8, 2013 at 5:47 comment added Will Sawin Does this explain some non-congruence modular curves?
May 8, 2013 at 3:25 comment added Will Chen ahh thanks. Didn't think to do that.
May 8, 2013 at 1:27 comment added S. Carnahan If you look at the source, you'll see that these are $(\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z})^{2g}$, Spec $\mathbb{Z}[1/\# G]$, and Spec $\mathbb{Z}[1/n]$, respectively.
May 8, 2013 at 0:51 comment added Marty But such a cool-looking paper!
May 8, 2013 at 0:50 comment added Marty Either that's a bizarre TeX error, or else I have a new entry for the question mathoverflow.net/questions/18593/…
May 8, 2013 at 0:27 comment added Will Chen Also $\text{Spec}(\mathbb{Z}[\nVdash/\ltimes])$ in the statement of theorem 3.1.1 on the first page.
May 8, 2013 at 0:25 comment added Will Chen Hmm, so in that arxiv paper, they're using some symbols I'm not familiar with. In particular, in the first paragraph, what does $(\mathbb{Z}/\ltimes\mathbb{Z})^{\nvDash\partial}$, and $\text{Spec}(\mathbb{Z}[\nVdash/\#\mathbb{G}])$ mean?
May 7, 2013 at 23:59 history edited Jonathan Wise CC BY-SA 3.0
added 12 characters in body
May 7, 2013 at 20:23 history answered JSE CC BY-SA 3.0